The Development of an Intelligent Web-Based Rapid Prototyping Manufacturing System - R.Published: 30 November 2012 July 2004, Volume 1, Issue 1 See also: The Task of the Referee, by Alan Smith. A short summary of your overall evaluation and recommendation.Suggestions on specific edits to fix, for example figures that are unclear or typos.Be careful to offer constructive suggestions about how the authors might address each of the latter. Your evaluation of strengths and weaknesses of the paper.You can suggest that the authors reference specific related papers you find, especially journal papers from the last 2-3 years.
For this part use Google, CiteSeer, or your library using keywords from the paper. Your evaluation of how well the paper reviews Related Work.A summary of the paper's main contributions in your own words (be careful not to simply restate the Abstract or Note to Practitioners).This is a body of text that should include these 5 parts: The key part of your review is the Advice to Authors, which should be at least 200 words. If the paper is not appropriate or needs to be revised for publication, please convey specifically how it can be improved. You want detailed and constructive feedback. When writing reviews, please put yourself into the position of the authors. If so notify the assigning editor immediately. We estimate it requires 1-4 hours to review a T-ASE submission.Īlso check that you don't have a conflict of interest (if you are on the same campus with a co-author or have written a paper with a co-author in the past 5 years).
When you receive a request to review a paper, please download the paper as soon as possible to check that it is within your expertise and confirm that you can commit to completing the review within 30 days. We respect your expertise and realize that your time is valuable. As a researcher, author, and member of our community, we hope that you will volunteer your time periodically to carefully review submitted papers.
Texas Tech Instructors can request access to Turnitin via the online request form. For more information or to use this tool, visit our iThenticate site. Thus, a manuscript can be submitted for review multiple times without creating text matches with itself. This text-matching service differs from Turnitin in two aspects: it uses a richer database of scholarly material and it does not store a copy of manuscripts submitted for review. iThenticate is designed for review of faculty and graduate research and scholarship. Turnitin is designed for classroom use only, and using it to check your own work is not recommended or approved. Graduate students should not use Turnitin to screen and revise their own writing. Instructors find the Originality Report useful as a tool to teach students proper citation practices and highlight the need for originality or to detect possible instances of plagiarism in student work.Ĭhoosing between Turnitin and iThenticate Students find the Originality Report useful for editing papers that include too many quotes and paraphrases. Spot check for plagiarism on one or two papers. Texas Tech Instructors could use Turnitin in the following ways:Īllow a class to submit assignments for which Turnitin generates an Originality Report.Īllow students to submit work, view the Originality Report, then edit their work before submitting the final copy to be graded.
Turnitin is web-based software that compares submitted assignments to its database of scholarly research and student papers and returns an Originality Report that highlights matching text.